![]() The picture is not good - I accept that - it was just a test. Not knocking the software, just puzzled how having the thumbnail showing a preview of the raw file is actually of benefit? It has an extensive library of over 800 high quality images, an advanced undo system, a great selection of photo effects, a wide variety of tools. In terms of organizing albums, you will find support for batch uploads, tags, titles, the ability to add ratings and notes. ![]() Now, if I'd just seen the thumbnail/preview showing the actual raw I wouldn't have a clue as to what could be salvaged from it. FastRawViewer supports all RAW file formats and offers intuitive operation. The other is after loading the RAW as above. Not for fastrawviewer, it actually shows the real raw file.īelow are 2 screenshots - one is the RAW file being viewed with the embedded jpg. Of course the thumbnails use the embedded jpg, but I think that applies to most image tools. Please see screenshot for settings for RAW image handling - hope this helps. It also does a different conversion than was done by the camera so don't be surprised if the resulting JPG looks different from the out of camera JPG even if you don't tell Batch Convert to make any changes. The Batch Convert tool does let you change the image size and even appearance so it is a useful tool for use with RAW images. As far as I can tell the only thing FastStone can actually do to a RAW file is to use the Batch Convert Tool to convert it into a JPG. I have tried various things, including reading the manual. FastStone Image Viewer is a fast, stable, user-friendly image browser, converter and editor. If you select a RAW file and edit it you are actually editing the embedded JPG. Alternatives to FastRawViewer FastStone Image Viewer. ![]() I have of late been using Faststone Image Viewer and have on the whole found it useful for the job compared to what I used to of importing into LR and cull from there. I would like to know how you are editing the RAW file in FastStone. Yes, it does much more functions but to date it is that first cull based on sharpness that can take the time. You do need to adjust the RAW settings to get past working on the embedded jpeg - but TBH I have only used that very occasionally. ![]() I am a long time user of FastStone and find that for both RAW and JPEG editing it provides 99.9% of all my needs. How do Faststone and XnViewMP compare from a feature and performance standpoint? I often hear that XnViewMP would be a better match for my needs. FastStone Capture is a powerful, lightweight, yet full-featured screen capture tool and screen video recorder.It allows you to easily capture and annotate anything on the screen including windows, objects, menus, full screen, rectangular / freehand / fixed regions as well as scrolling windows / web pages. Works well for me, except that while it is "color aware", it is not "color managed". I've been a long time Faststone user - mostly for quick viewing and image culling - less so for editing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |